9 Comments
User's avatar
PJ's avatar

I love seeing the fenben news get out!

I never got the “shots” and never had cancer, and I’ve done fenbendazole treatments once a year, the past two years, as a parasite/ anti cancer /whatever treatment.

I couldn’t even tell I was taking anything. My chickens and dog got the treatment too. My friends and I go to the farm supply / Amazon and get the largest size dog dewormer packages sold by Merck. There are other products out there too… The point I wanted to make is … we couldn’t even tell we took anything. No effects, nothing. And if you’re thinking its all malarkey and snake oil.. well the first treatment released liver flukes.

So … it works… and it seems harmless. 🦋

Expand full comment
Leslie Dennis Taylor's avatar

I’ve heard a lot people say they passed liver flukes. My husband and I have both taken it with no side effects.

Expand full comment
Moro Balakrishnan's avatar

Great summary that. Compliments to Dr. Les Taylor. Ivermectin and Fenbendazole and a host of other repurposed drugs should become world scale therapies as early as possible, as must Dr. Liu’s CDS injection therapy. Ways must be found, as well as philanthropists who will support this development. Like Mexico, is India a low cost possibility ? The practice of medicine is quite sound here and there are both government run and corporate sector large cancer centres here. I would particularly look at Christian Medical College ( CMC) in the medium sized city of Vellore in the state of Tamil Nadu (TN) in southern India. It is an old, missionary cancer hospital well known in Southern India. It also treats lots of poor patients on a concessional basis

Expand full comment
Moro Balakrishnan's avatar

I couldn’t complete the message earlier. Please get in touch with the hospital to appraise them of your work. It is a research hospital, but I am not sure if they would have come to know of your work, as this work has not entered main stream publications in a big way. I can try to inform them, but since I don’t have an active professional standing, I would get ignored. India also carries a huge cancer baggage, though its per capita position would be lower because of the huge population. A good footing here for these exceptional protocols would help advance them on the world stage.

Expand full comment
Moro Balakrishnan's avatar

Although Ivermectin, Fenbendazole etc have found favour with many of you dedicated to repurposed drugs, I recall reading that nearly 25 years ago, some researcher clinicians have considered cancers as a parasitic condition and proposed the use of anthelminitics for treating cancer. We can now infer the reasons why the work wasn’t allowed to progress, we lost 15 years atleast in an effective fight against cancer. I am glad about the new determination to take this science through to fruition. I was commenting in another column that was disparaging this kind of work with repurposed medicines that there is no reason to discount the possibility that cancerous cells are parasites, especially in the way they grow. So anti parasitic medications were quite appropriate. We have now CQ and HCQ also looking promising. Why not other anti malarials like Primquine, Artemisinin, Astemazole etc. ?

In 2020, Dr. Nevan Krogan of Biosciences Institute, UCSF had likened the Covid virus to the cancer cells in how both hijack the cellular functions to promote their growth, kinases controlled pathways and had thus found some common cancer drugs being effective in Covid. This became unnecessary as the story got flipped and many common respiratory medicines including anti histamines, anti inflammatories, immmune modulators worked very well in Covid and in 2021 and 2022 became the mainstay against the ravages of delta and omicron. So why not the possibility that many such common medicines from many different indications that proved anti virals can also fight cancer ? We can always cite successful anti cancer examples like Ivermectin and Doxycycline to support this possibility. Even with my limited background, I am not whistling in the wind when I say that many many common drug molecules are not just anti virals, they could be useful for cancer therapy also. With cancer increasingly looking like a metabolic disease, this common therapeutic profile for cancer also seems very much a reality.

Expand full comment
Xuewu Liu's avatar

If fenbendazole were to be submitted to the FDA for approval as a new drug for cancer treatment, the complete process would require at least $70M to $350M.

- However, utilizing drug repurposing or the orphan drug pathway could lower costs to $20M to $50M.

- Another low-cost option would be to first conduct trials and launch in countries with less stringent regulations (e.g., Mexico) before applying to the FDA, which would cost only $10M to $30M.

Expand full comment
Xuewu Liu's avatar

If fenbendazole were to be submitted to the FDA for approval as a new drug for cancer treatment, the complete process would require at least $70M to $350M.

- However, utilizing drug repurposing or the orphan drug pathway could lower costs to $20M to $50M.

- Another low-cost option would be to first conduct trials and launch in countries with less stringent regulations (e.g., Mexico) before applying to the FDA, which would cost only $10M to $30M.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 21
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Leslie Dennis Taylor's avatar

Hi James, Thanks for your comment. We have a lot of the same interests as I've seen all those videos: Kathleen Ruddy, the Ivermectin documentary, and the Rockefeller video. In fact, I wrote a post about Rockefeller taking over medicine that you might want to pass on to others.

https://fastwell.substack.com/p/a-pill-for-an-ill-the-story-of-modern

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 21
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Leslie Dennis Taylor's avatar

Thanks for the quiz. I didn't look up even one verse because I thought it'd be more fun to see what I knew off the top of my head. My answers are in all caps.

– What Food did God provide for mankind

& Animals? Gen. 1:29-30 +

Ezekiel 47:12

FRUIT

– What age did God specify for humans

after the Flood? Gen. 6:3

120

– How many of each type animal did God

tell Noah to take on the Ark?

Gen. 6:19-21… don’t stop yet, go to:

Gen. 7:1-3

THEY TOOK 2 OF EACH ANIMAL EXCEPT FOR THE SACRIFICIAL ANIMALS THEY TOOK MORE (6 OF EACH MAYBE?)

– When did man become carnivores?

Gen. 9:2&3

AFTER THE FLOOD

– What was the age of Abraham & Sarah

when Isaac was born? Gen. 17:17

I THINK SARAH WAS AROUND 91 AND ABRAHAM WAS AROUND 101?

– What was Sarah’s age when she died?

Gen. 23:1

MAYBE 120?

— What two items did God expressly

forbid people to eat?

Gen. 9:4 & Lev. 3:17

THE BLOOD. I DON'T REMEMBER A SECOND THING.

– What was Abraham’s age when he

died? Gen. 25:7

180???

– What was the age of Moses when he

died and the status of his health?

Deut. 34:7

IN GOOD HEALTH, I CAN'T REMEMBER HIS AGE, 160?

– What are the Dietary Laws?

Deut. 14:3-21

MY GUESS IS THESE VERSES ARE THE ONES ABOUT BLEEDING THE ANIMALS, DON'T COOK A BABY GOAT IN ITS MOTHER'S MILK, AND THE RULES FOR WHICH ANIMALS, I.E. SEA CREATURES MUST HAVE SCALES, MUST CHEW THE CUD (COW) AND PART THE HOOF (GOAT BUT NOT HORSE)

– To what diet did Daniel and other

Israelite children adhere? Dan. 1:1-17

ONLY VEGETABLES BUT THAT WAS ONLY BECAUSE THE MEAT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PROPERLY PREPARED ACCORDING TO JEWISH LAW AND WOULD HAVE BEEN KINDS OF MEAT NOT KOSHER SUCH AS PORK, SHELLFISH ETC. THE DANIEL STORY IS NOT A JUSTIFICATION TO BE VEGETARIAN IN GENERAL

– What does God’s Word say about “the

food of Kings”?

Ps. 141:4 & Pro. 23:1-3

DON'T DESIRE THEIR DELICACIES? DON'T EAT TOO MUCH OF THE KING'S FOOD

– What is the effect of NOT knowing

Gods’ Word? Hosea 4:6, Proverbs 26:2

NOT KNOWING WHAT? I'LL HAVE TO LOOK THESE VERSES UP LATER. TOO VAGUE OF A QUESTION TO GUESS WHAT THESE VERSES SAY WITHOUT LOOKING THEM UP.

– Who are included in wrath judgment for

disobedience? Isaiah 66: 15-17

EVERYONE

– To whom does Gods’ Laws apply?

Matt. 5:45

EVERYONE

– Do the OT Laws apply today?

Matt. 5:17-20; John 10:10; 1John 5:2-3;

2John 5-6; John 14:21;

I BELIEVE THE CEREMONIAL LAWS WERE FULFILLED BY CHRIST SO I EAT PORK AND SHRIMP BECAUSE GOD TOLD PETER IN A VISION TO NOT CALL WHAT IS UNCLEAN WHAT GOD HAS MADE CLEAN. THEREFORE HE DECLARED ALL FOODS CLEAN. BUT THE MORAL LAW, SUCH AS THE 10 COMMANDMENTS, STILL APPLIES. AND THE REASONING BEHIND THE LAWS ALSO APPLIES. FOR INSTANCE, PAUL SAYS THAT WHEN THE MOSIAC LAW SAID NOT TO MUZZLE AN OXEN WHILE IT'S TREADING THE GRAIN, THE PRINCIPLE APPLIES TO ALL TIMES: LET THOSE WHO ARE LABORING PARTICIPATE IN THE FRUITS.

– What does Jesus say about the Law?

Matt. 5:17-19: John 14: 15 & 21

NOT ONE JOT OR TIDDLE WILL PASS AWAY. HE DIDN'T COME TO DESTROY THE LAW BUT TO FULFILL IT.

Expand full comment